|
Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 1:11:59 GMT -5
APart I no. of March Decision no. of April published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of April and Decision no. of June published in the Official Gazette of Romania Part I no. of July the Court ruled that the issue of the conflict of interest is not constitutionally the constituent legislator expressly and limitingly establishing only the cases in which the capacity of deputy or senator ceases cases that do not refer to the conflict of interests Decision no. of February point X. Therefore the conflict of interests does not constitute a case of termination Country Email List of the mandate of deputy or senator. Thus from the point of view of extracriminal legislation the Court notes that during the period the provisions regarding the conflict of interest in the exercise of the capacity of deputy or senator also applied to them without expressly indicating the cases of conflict of interest and in the period it is a relatively confusing normative situation since a declaration of interests the extracriminal institution of. The conflict of interests did not apply to deputies and senators. It is only since that a case of conflict of interest expressly provided for as well as the obligation of deputies and senators to comply with the legislation on conflict of interest art. I point of Law no. otherwise the deed of the deputy or senator being a disciplinary offense and sanctioned with the reduction of the allowance for a maximum period of months. . In criminal matters the Court notes that art. of the Criminal Code of in force on the date of adoption of Law no. was introduced into the active fund of the legislation.
|
|